Menu Sidebar

Why Aren’t Smartwatches Smaller?

You may know by now that I’ve decided that my Apple Watch is no longer a device I want to use. I won’t go into the details here, because I spell it out in the article I link to above.

But Apple’s is not the only smartwatch out there; there are lots of them. And most of them are very big. Apple’s watch comes in two sizes: 38mm and 42mm. Other smartwatches are even bigger; some Android watches are as big as 46mm.

This seems to be a trend in the watch industry. Since I have been looking at watches, I’ve noticed how many of them are honking big. 40mm seems to be the standard size for many watches, with some much larger. And the ones with all those buttons make you look like you’re wearing a carburetor on your wrist.

There are still plenty of watches that are smaller: you can get 35-36mm watches fairly easily, and some come even smaller than that. But, for the most part, watches are big, so someone can read the time from across the room. (And, presumably, mostly men buy this type of watch.)

Smartwatches need to show a lot of data, so they tend to be larger. But not everyone wants all that data. My Macworld colleague Caitlin McGarry just reviewed the Withings Activité Steel HR (, Amazon UK), which merely has a time dial, a “goal” dial, and a small OLED display for showing limited amounts of data. It’s available in two sizes: 36mm (really 36.3mm) and 40mm (really 39.5mm).

You may think that’s fine; but look at the 36mm model on Caitlin’s wrist:

Withings steel hr 2 100704741 large

I’ve never met Caitlin, but she has told me that she has tiny wrists. That watch, on her wrist, looks like a 46mm watch would on mine. (I’ve chosen a 38mm Junghans Max Bill, which is about as big as I want a watch to be.)

It’s worth noting that the battery can make a watch bigger, but the smaller the display – that’s the part that uses the most power – the smaller the battery has to be. And smartwatches get their power more from the thickness of the battery; this Withings watch is 13mm thick, and the Apple Watch are 10.5 – 11.4mm.

So why aren’t the smartwatch makers catering to people with smaller wrists, especially for women and, perhaps, teenagers? Particularly this type of smartwatch that doesn’t try to display a lot of data? Is it because only men buy these devices? It seems like there is a potential segment of the market that’s not being addressed. If the smallest smartwatch you can get is honking big, you may simply not want to wear one.

No internet connection? Be prepared for iTunes to drive you crazy

It’s no secret that the iTunes Store is so tightly integrated into the iTunes application that it’s almost as though they were Siamese twins. As your local copy of iTunes has become increasingly linked to Apple’s cloud, it has become dependent on internet access.

But what if you don’t have internet access? Your connection is down; or your router is broken; or you simply don’t want your computer to connect to the internet? Well, iTunes will remind you of this, over and over and over. In such a case, iTunes will pop up an alert every single time you play a song and every time one song finishes and another one begins.

Read the rest of the article on Macworld.

What Would it Take for Me to Be Bullish on Apple Again?

I had one of those idle moments today when I sat peacefully and mused about my existence. I was thinking about the work I had to do over the next week, and reflecting on my work in general. I’ve been writing about Apple for more than 15 years, and in recent months I’ve found myself looking at this company, which once seemed unique, as though it is just another purveyor of beige boxes.

Naturally, they are no longer beige, nor are they really boxes. They are pocket computers, wrist computers, and more traditional laptop and desktop computers. But they’re not exciting anymore; they’re not edgy. I remember the launch of the first iMac, which shook up the computer market, and its subsequent revisions which refined the product’s raison d’être. I remember the launch of the iPod, in some distant past, which truly did change the way I interact with music. And, of course, I remember the launch of the first iPhone, just over 10 years ago, which, while seriously lacking in features, represented a new paradigm.

But in the past few years, Apple has been gliding along on their success, unable or unwilling to make new products that make me say “aha!” Yes, there was the Apple Watch, that clunky device whose first iteration contained a kitchen sink of software feature. Apple used us as beta testers to determine what we might want in a smartwatch. And they then refined the software, in version 2, and even more in version 3, to meet those needs. (I recently gave up my Apple Watch, because it’s just not worth the hassle.)

And what has Apple shown us lately? Yet another iPhone, thinner and lighter, with a better camera, blah, blah, blah. (Thinner, rather than with better battery life.) And AirPods; Apple’s new Bluetooth earbuds. They are interesting devices, but you’d be hard pressed to be able to buy any, as Apple doesn’t seem to know how to manufacture them.

There was a new laptop, the MacBook Pro the Touch Bar, an excessively expensive, underpowered, non-pro device that is not very compelling. And there is still the Mac Pro. That computer released more than three years ago, not updated, with three-year old technology, selling for the same price as it did back then. Apple should simply be ashamed that they are still selling this computer.

And what about software? I would say Apple’s operating systems are a bit more stable in the past couple of years than they were a while ago, but there are still far too many things that don’t work. iTunes, which, in many ways, is Apple’s flagship app, just gets more and more confusing. (I say it is Apple’s flagship app because it is the gateway to Apple music, at least on the desktop, which is one of the services Apple is working hard to promote for the future.) In my Ask the iTunes Guy column, which I’ve been writing for several years, I see the problems people have in using this app, and how frustrated they are with Apple because of it. If there is one area Apple needs to improve, it is iTunes, and the iOS Music app. (They could hire me to help understand the problems people face; I’m only half kidding…)

This is not entirely Apple’s fault. The entire computing industry has reached a plateau, and it is hard to come up with new devices and new features. But Apple got us used to words like “magical” and “revolutionary,” but when they use those words now to describe a features that blurs the background when you take photos, you simply can’t take them seriously. Yet when Microsoft comes up with an interesting design for a computer (the Surface Studio), we are truly surprised. But this is because Microsoft has never been the guiding light in hardware innovations.

So what would it take for me to see Apple in a positive light? Perhaps the company start by exercising a bit of humility. Stop talking about the “courage” it took to remove the headphone jack from the iPhone. Stop saying, as Tim Cook often does, “we have great products coming up this year,” when there’s not much new stuff, and it’s not really great. (I know, this is all marketing.)

Be honest; explain that these computing devices have become commodified, that we won’t see the radical improvements from iteration to iteration. Yet, at the same time, figure out how to make them work better. Develop new software, new services, because that’s the future of computing.

I like Apple; I like Apple products. I have been using Macs for more than 25 years. Yet recently, I just don’t feel that Apple is a forward-looking company anymore. The “magic” is gone. Maybe that time is over; maybe Apple won’t be able to be as “revolutionary” in the future. Maybe the next iMac will be beige.

Why, iTunes?

In Songs view, here’s part of my Artists list (I list Composers’ names in the Artist tag to make them easier to browse on iOS devices):


And now, in Artists view:


Why is that artist listed four times (once with a photo that clearly isn’t Herr Bach)?

And that’s not the worst; I’ve got dozens of artists who appear multiple times in the Artists list. Hot Tuna is there a dozen times.

Go figure…

Herman Melville’s Bartleby and the steely strength of mild rebellion – The Guardian

There are very few stories that, on re-reading after re-reading, seem to become impossibly more perfect, but Herman Melville’s eerie, aching story Bartleby, the Scrivener is one such. Like a parable without an obvious moral, it is defiance raised to the metaphysical.

The plot is easily comprehensible; the meaning utterly elusive. The narrator, an unnamed New York lawyer, takes on a new scrivener, or copyist. Our lawyer describes his own philosophy as “the easiest way of life is the best” and relishes that he has a “snug retreat” where he can “do a snug business among rich men’s bonds and mortgages and title deeds”. He has two clerks already, nicknamed Turkey and Nippers, and a junior jack-of-all-trades, a boy called Ginger Nut.

Business is doing so well that the narrator takes on Bartleby, described as “pallidly neat, pitiably respectable, incurably forlorn”. He works “silently, palely, mechanically”, and on the third day of his employment is asked to proofread a document. He says – and it is almost the only thing he ever says in the story: “I would prefer not to.” He instead prefers, if anything, to look at the blank brick wall that is the entire view from his window.


JG Ballard once wrote of a future Adolf Hitler emerging from the “timeless wastes” of “modern shopping malls”. Melville, I think, offers a more dangerously hopeful idea: that revolutionary resistance comes from a man in a conventional suit mildly stating there are things he would rather not do. It is, for Bartleby, the route to a kind of martyrdom.

A lesson for our time.

Source: Herman Melville’s Bartleby and the steely strength of mild rebellion | Books | The Guardian

Older Posts


Writings about Macs, music, and more by Kirk McElhearn